A Brief Account
of the Crusades
(Excerpted by Dr. A. Zahoor
from 'For Christ's Sake' by A. Thomson and M. 'Ata'ur-Rahim)
At
the beginning of the thirteenth century, the Roman Catholic Church was in an
almost impossible situation. On one hand the institution was threatened with
severe corruption from within its own structure. On the other hand it was faced
with redundancy on account of the popularity of the teaching of the
Paulicians. Furthermore its attention was divided
and diverted by its involvement in the folly of the Crusades. Much of its
activity at this time was directed towards attempting to halt the rapid advance
of Islam and to recapture Jerusalem:
The leaders of the
Vatican must have seen the marked similarity between Islam and Unitarianism as
preached by Arius. Both believed in One God. Both accepted Jesus as a prophet
who nevertheless was still a man. Both believed in the Virgin Mary and in the
immaculate conception of Jesus, and both accepted the Holy Spirit but rejected
the divinity which had been attributed to him. So the hatred for the Arians
was transferred to the Muslims. Looking at the Crusades with this perspective
they cease to be an isolated phenomenon of Church history, but become an
extension of the massacre of the Arians by the Pauline church." [Mary
and Jesus in the Qur'an].
There is no scope in the present work to cover
the phenomenon of the Crusades either in depth or detail. They began and ended
in confusion, and many people died in the process. The first Crusade
which began in 1096 was formed, writes Gibbon, mostly of thieves and criminals.
This was the consequence of the Council of Clermont in 1095 in which the Pope
proclaimed that anyone who joined the Crusade would be given full dispensation
of all his sins and would be relieved of any criminal penance he might owe.
The practice of granting dispensations had
been instituted in the fifth century by the Catholic Church. In return for a sum
of money the Pope would grant a licence either to excuse or to permit an action
which was otherwise canonically illegal....
As a result of the decree of the Council of
Clermont, anyone who had committed some wrong action, from theft to murder,
flocked under the banner of the cross. The rabble of 60,000 men and women
pillaged their way across Europe. On reaching Hungary they came face to face
with Paulicians whose forefathers had originally been driven north from Thrace
by the persecution of the Empress Theodora and her successors. There was a major
battle, and two-thirds of the Crusaders were killed. The survivors took refuge
in the mountains of Thrace. The Emperor of Constantinople came to their rescue
and safely conducted them to the city. When they reached Constantinople, its
treasures proved a great temptation for them. They would have plundered the city
had the Emperor not swiftly conducted them over the Bosphorus.
Reinforcements of better-trained soldiers were
sent to join the remnants of the first Crusaders. When, led by Godfrey, they
arrived at Constantinople, they proceeded to fight the Emperor and laid siege to
the city. The Emperor, however, managed to bribe and persuade them to hold to
their original plan which was to fight the Muslims and to take Jerusalem, and
they too were conducted across the Bosphorus. Godfrey eventually reached and
conquered Jerusalem in 1099.
The Second Crusade was undertaken
forty-eight years after the fall of Jerusalem in 1147 in order to support the
survivors of the First Crusade. The gates of the cities both in Europe and Asia
were closely barred against the Crusaders, and food was only let down to them
from the walls in baskets. This food was of the poorest quality, stale, and
often unfit for human consumption. The Crusaders were plagued by famine and
pestilence. Many of them died before they reached Palestine. The survivors were
killed in battle. Jerusalem was reconquered by the Muslims in 1187.
The Third Crusade, led by, among
others, King Richard of England, failed to recapture Jerusalem. Richard returned
to England in 1192 with the remnants of an army which had been decimated by
shipwreck and battle.
The Fourth Crusade chose an easier
object of conquest and, despite the fact that Constantinople was in the hands of
the Official Christians, succeeded where the first two crusades had failed. In
1203, they burst into the ancient capital of the East, pillaging and plundering.
The churches were ransacked, and the booty from them not only subsequently
popularized the practice of image-worship in the west, but also greatly
increased the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church:
The most enlightened of
the strangers, above the gross and sensual pursuits of their countrymen, more
piously exercised the right of conquest in the search and seizure of the
relics of the saints. Immense was the supply of heads and bones, crosses and
images, that were scattered by this revolution over the churches of Europe;
and such was the increase of pilgrimage and oblation, that no branch, perhaps,
of more lucrative plunder was imported from the east. Of the writings of
antiquity, many that still existed in the twelfth century are now
lost...without computing the extent of our loss, we may drop a tear over the
libraries that have perished in the triple fire of Constantinople. [Decline
and Fall of the Roman Empire, VII, p. 385].
Despite the wealth which accrued from the sack
of Constantinople, the Crusades were a costly business, not only financially but
in terms of lives. With the growth of the Paulician movement in France, the
Catholic Church was forced to direct its attention towards securing its position
in Europe itself. This change in emphasis was probably one of the major reasons
for the failure of the Fifth Crusade, which started in 1218. The Church
had committed itself to attacking the Muslims of Sicily and North Africa, the
Muslims of Turkey and Palestine, the Muslims of Spain, and now the Paulician
Catharii of France. It was impossible to maintain a successful degree of
aggression on all fronts at all four points of the compass for very long.
Inevitably the Church was forced to reduce its ambitious activities, and to
direct its attention towards its enemies who were nearest Rome.
The 'Poor Men of Lyons', who wore robes and
sandals, emulating Jesus, soon met with opposition from the Official Church, for
they refused to worship Jesus as God....In about 1190, they joined with the
Paulician Catharii. Their numbers were now so large that the Catholic Church was
in danger of being superseded and replaced by them. They rejected the whole
structure of the priesthood of the Official Church as an innovation, for they
knew that every human being has direct access to God. They had their own
gospels, written in Romance. These were accessible to all who wished to read
them, which was very popular with the people who, under the rule of the Catholic
Church, had very little access even to the official gospels.
Thus for instance Fra.
Fulgentio was reprimanded by the Pope in a letter saying, 'Preaching of the
Scriptures is a suspicious thing. He who keeps close to the Scripture will
ruin the Catholic faith.' In his next letter he was more explicit, warning
against too much insistence on the scriptures 'which is a book if anyone keeps
close to, he will quite destroy the Catholic Church.'
The only way the Official Church could
maintain its status quo was by suppression, repression and oppression.
Allahu
alam